satellite
Sun Earth
Pic.1 107 534 km/hr
If the Earth were going around the Sun, then the speed of the satellite would
have to adjust due to the different gravitational pull of the Earth. When
the satellite is behing the Earth it would have to “chase” the Earth. When
in front of Earth, the Earth would chase the satellite. Since the Earth is
supposedly going around the Sun with the speed of 107 534 km/hr, the speed
of the satellite would have to DRASTICALLY change to account for the change
of the gravity pull.
Satellite Moon
Earth
Sun
Pic.2
If the universe revolves around the Earth, Earth’s gravitational pull on the satellite would be the same regardless of its position on the orbit. Furthermore, Sun and Moon’s gravities acting on Earth would balance. The Sun is bigger but farther. The Moon is smaller but closer.
1. The Earth doesn't have centrifugal force. Gravity is the same all over the Earth because the Earth doesn’t move. If it did, the centrifugal force would make objects weigh TWICE less on Equator than in E.g Vancouver, Canada.
2. Doing the same experiment with a SOUND WAVE fortunately can check this. Doppler’s effect would apply.
3. Michelson-Morley experiment doesn’t indicate that the light travels with the same speed independent of Earth’s motion. It indicates that the Earth is stationary.
4. Microwave radiation is 2.7 all over the Earth because the Earth doesn’t move.
5. weight of objects would be affected depending on which side of the Earth they would be. The “density distribution”theory wouldn’t help, because it would have to change non-stop as the Earth rotates. If the weight of objects is not changing with the location on Earth, then the centrifugal force couldn’t possibly make the Earth bulge at the equator. That proves Newton wrong.
6. The Earth doesn't have its "density" distributed so exactly as to ideally match the centrifugal force. Such argument is self serving, arbitrary and logiacally invalid because there is no evidence to measure it and therefore to support it.
Not Earth’s “density” for which there is no evidence other than that it “has to be this way”).
7. The shapes of "constellations" don't change from thousands of years.
8. Earth is the only planet with millions of life forms. The Bible mentions only life on Earth.
9. Only humans are capable of having "point of view", therefore it's OUR point of view that matters as CENTRAL.
10. Copernicus didn’t provide evidence to support his theory.
11. Contrary to Copernicus, it's not mathematically possible to “calculate” if the Earth is revolving around the Sun.
12. Newton’sthought experiment with bucket of water, indicates that the Earth is not revolving. (The water should sway if the Earth was revolving). That's classic example of lack of centrifugal force of supposedly rotating Earth.
Now we know that the Earth is not flattened on the top and bottom. If that was true, objects would weigh differently.
13. On time-delayed pictures of stars, the Polaris star almost doesn’t move. The only way it can work is if both the Earth and Polaris don’t move. The Earth is therefore the centre of the universe and Polaris it its end.
14.
The circular movement of stars on time-delayed pictures cannot be created
by Earth’s rotation. If the Earth revolved the paths of stars would be horizontal
not circular.(Pic.3)
14.Satellites go around the Earth because the space around revolves, thus acting on satellites. You can even put coca cola can and make it a satellite.
15.The constellations don't change, year after year.
16.Heavenly bodies don't collapse together, because their attraction is perfectly balanced by equal centrifugal force resulting from the revolving around the Earth.
17.The universe is found to expand AWAY from the Earth with EQUAL speed, that means that the Universe STARTED from the Earth.
18. God started to create the Universe from the Earth, why would a perfect being put it later somewhere else? Wouldn't he put it where it was supposed to be right away? He is perfect so why would he NOT start from the CENTER, as the center is perfectly balanced and therefore requires less effort to start there. By the way. Did I mention that Bible says that God created the sphere of the Earth and hang it over nothing? That was when no human could imagine the Earth hanging over nothing.
The Bible also says that the Earth is MOTIONLESS. Since Rotation is "motion" and there is no motion, hence the Earth doesn't rotate.
Pic.3
The Earth’s horizontal rotation would create horizontal paths of stars. (Pic.4)
Pic.4
However, what we see is this. (Pic.5)
Polaris
Polaris Effect.
On
several time-delayed pictures there are shown circulating stars. Supposedly,
because of Earth’s movement around its own axis. However, their circulation is
in the wrong direction… If Earth is moving around, then the stars should “move”
horizontally, with slight bent upward on northern hemisphere and a slight bent
downward on southern hemisphere. That’s because Earth is a sphere. The stars
should appear to move in opposite direction to Earth’s movement. In fact, the
stars are moving in a circle, around a star Polaris. Hence, “Polaris effect”.
The stars on the outside of Polaris move faster. It is because; the distance
they traveled is bigger. They also move in unison, which proves that they are
somehow connected. To make it even more puzzling, the time interval of the film
exposure does not match the part of the circle that the star would travel in
that part of day. I mean if the time exposure is 4 hours, then if 24 hours is
full circle then 4 hours should be one sixth of the full circle. However, it’s
only about 1/12. The direction of stars’ rotation seems to be the same as
Earth’s… If Earth is turning from left to right, then the stars should appear
to turn from right to left! If the stars move from left to right, then Earth
may be stationary. The Polaris star is always stationary. The only way a point
can remain stationary, is when both the observer and the point are stationary,
or both move in unison. Since the other stars move in unison relatively to
Earth, the Polaris and the Earth must be motionless.